Senin, 01 Februari 2010 - 16:27:39 WIB
INSPIRING PRE-SERVICE TEACHERS IN SUPPORTING CHILD RIGHTS IN EDUCATION
Diposting oleh : Administrator
Kategori: pendidikan - Dibaca: 149 kali




INSPIRING PRE-SERVICE TEACHERS

 

IN SUPPORTING CHILD RIGHTS IN EDUCATION



 

 

 

 


By:  H.A. R. Tilaar

Professor Emeritus UNJ

 

 

PROLOGUE

 

George Ritzer suggests that today’s globalization and the materialistic view of life have led people to empty life.[1] Such trend has also penetrated into the world of education and changed educational institutions into ones that prepare just for producing skilful manpower. Commercialization of education has brought up robotic human beings with no heart. Educational institutions have become prisons due to their being used only as facilities for human resource investment for the sake of economic purposes. Thus, educational institutions are not child-friendly anymore.

 

I.      WHAT IS A "CHILD FRIENDLY SCHOOL"?

 

A child is born powerless, yet, equipped with various capabilities to be developed to live in a human environment. Educational institutions such as families and schools function to assist children in developing their potentials: intellectual, emotional, moral and social. These potential capabilities need to be developed. Development of these potentials requires a situation of freedom that can allow education participants to make their choices. Capability and opportunity to make choices is one human characteristic. Therefore, the freedom education participant needs of is not freedom in everything but one to make choices for which they will initially be assisted by educators or parents. In this respect, educators/parents are leaders who provide opportunities and gradually assist children in learning to make choices on their own so that eventually they become independent human beings.

Generally, ‘Child-Friendly School’ bears the meaning of a school that can meet the needs of learning participants in an atmosphere of freedom so that they can develop their potentials to become independent people.[2] A Child-Friendly School (CFS) does not completely follow Rousseau’s Back to Nature concept but, more precisely, Back to Nature and Culture.

 

II.    THE TASK OF THE TEACHERS IN THE CHILD-FRIENDLY SCHOOL

 

Children as vulnerable human beings were thrown into the world without power. It is the responsibility of the parents/educators to assist these powerless children to become, gradually, independent.

The first world experienced by education participant is their own family. In loving environment, they begin to get to know their world and develop their potentials as well as their preferences. In human environment, these potentials are developed through habit and learning so that a child can identify the kind of life that is appropriate for him/herself in his or her respective human environment. This is the kind of education atmosphere that is relevant to the needs of children, one that is challenging to the development of child’s potentials. Indeed, in one’s life there are "reward and punishment" that aim at assisting a child to become an independent person. In such learning environment that children can gradually become independent or mature with the loving and caring relationship between themselves and their parents. Dialog between parents and children that exists in a loving atmosphere is the main characteristic of the educational situation of institutions that respect the needs of participants.

In the modern society, educational institutions or schools are consecutive to the primary educational institution i.e. family. In this way, educators becomes surrogates of parents, who assist education participant in understanding the various aspects of life such as advancement in science and technology, moral values of the changing world, aesthetic values, and the values of sharing life with the society.

What is the function of educational institution (school) in the today’s rapidly changing society? By respecting the needs of children and considering the fact that the world is rapidly changing, these institutions of modern society do not exist only as ‘transfer of knowledge’ institutions; rather, they provide attention towards the development of education participant’ capabilities to make own choices and develop themselves. Thus, educational institutions are not merely ones to accommodate the aspirations of present generation but also their needs as the heirs of future life with its widely open possibilities. This means that development of creativity, freedom to think and do within the framework of shared-living morality becomes the paradigm underlying these modern educational institutions.

To sum up, CFS is not a prison for children, where they receive indoctrination the values of the old generation, but a ‘cooking-pot’ for them in an atmosphere of freedom to study values of the past, present and the future.[3]


 This is the kind of educational institution that is challenging to education participant, one that prepares participants to look into their future with complete responsibility.

 

III.   CHALLENGES OF FACING TEACHING PROFESSION TODAY

 

What is going on in the educational institution of today’s globalization era? As discussed earlier, the globalization era has brought about considerable changes in educational institutions.

 

1.            School as a social institution of the modern society has been part of globalization that is lack of spirit or character. Schools are not anymore the place for developing the potentials and needs of children but one for meeting the needs of the materialistic society. Educational institutions are not the place for developing the moral quality of society members but ones that serve as economic investment for developing required human resource. The underlying paradigm of education is now "return to investment." Economic considerations have been the reference of educational process existing in modern schools.

2.            Schools have turned to become prisons. Educational institutions of the modern society have become an arena for the inculcation of values that are considered important to the society as of primary ones. The values include those for achieving materialistic happiness, values of competition that are based on Darwinism social concept: “the strong, smart, and wealthy ones will likely survive in life.” The competition principles, market forces, and global values in McDonaldization of education have become the major objective of educational institutions. Internalization and development of the local values inherent in local cultures begin to fade and replaced by the heartless global ones. This is what so called commercialization of educational process in the educational institutions that have changed into prisons.

Can the above illustrated trend be changed?

 

IV.  PRE-SERVICE CURRICULUM IN TEACHER EDUCATION

 

 

CFS requires professional teachers who understand and respect the needs of children. This can be achieved through the curriculum of Teacher Education.

Teacher Education curriculum basically consists of two components: 1). Theoretical component and 2). Praxis component.

 

Theoretical component

 

First of all, prospective professional educators need to be introduced to educational theories that emphasize on educational process as the process of giving freedom. Paulo Freire’s theory (Freirean movement)[4] needs to be comprehended by prospective educators, among others, to make educational process a process to give freedom to education participants rather than a banking system. In this context, the function and responsibility of educators are not a process of indoctrination that prepare education participants to pass in all kinds of tests and examinations to meet the standards set out by the government, yet, to lead them to become people of freedom. People who are aware of their own existence, among others, realize their needs for releasing themselves from the pressure of powers such as poverty, violation of human rights, and other kinds of discrimination found in the life of human beings.[5]

 

Praxis component

 

Prospective professional educators begin to be introduced to alternative educational institutions that provide the widest opportunities for education participants to develop thinking and acting based on morality. Such kind of institutions can be found, either organized by the government or society members. The forms of alternative education will be discussed further.

 

V.   THE NEEDS OF PEDAGOGY BASED ON LOCAL WISDOM

 

Globalization tends to eliminate local values.[6] In today educational institutions, there is a tendency to set up global values by creating international standards; for example, the various ISO standards in trade that also begin to be implemented in educational field in the form of educational standards with a view to establishing schools of international standards and a number of rank scheme for establishing "world class education" such as "world class university".

Can “local wisdom” in educational science become the way out to bring back the spirit to education (in Indonesia)? We can observe simply two examples in which “local wisdom” can have significant value in overcoming de-personification of educational institutions. The two examples are as follows:

 

1.    Tamansiswa Educational Institution

 

The principle of Tamansiswa is “Tut Wuri Handayani”,[7] which means that educators position themselves behind education participants. Yet, they can also be at the sides to guide, or in front to lead education participants in their state of freedom. This local wisdom has begun to fade in Indonesian national education although “Tut Wuri Handayani” has been established as the coat of arms of the National Education Ministry. Schools are not prisons but a “garden/park” where children can actualize themselves under the guidance of their educators.

 

2.    Nature Functions as Teacher  (”Alam takambang jadi guru”)

 

This is the local wisdom from West Sumatera that underlies Moh. Syafei’s entrepreneur education in Kayutanam. In this educational paradigm, the universe, which begins with the surrounding cultural and natural environment of education participants, are the primary educator.[8]

That is how local wisdom in education can make schools of modern society to be friendly institutions to children. In this way, they can lead education participants to the global world while remain keeping its content, i.e. local values beneficial to share living with other people in this globalizing world.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


  • "Do not sacrifice education, teachers and young people on the altar of the crisis!"
  • World Teachers’ Day: "Build the future: Invest in teachers now!"
  • Indonesia: teacher union joins the ILO to combat child labour
  • 0 Komentar :

    Isi Komentar :
    Nama :
    Website :
    Komentar
     
     (Masukkan 6 kode diatas)

     

    Untitled Document
    Untitled Document
    .: Berita Singkat :.
  • Guangzhou, China, 14 Desember 2010, PGRI telah menandatangani MoU dengan South China Normal University dalam rangka peningkatan profesionalisme guru.

  • Konferensi Kerja Nasional III PGRI Tahun 2011

    27-30 Januari 2011
    Provinsi Gorontalo

  • Seoul, 5 Maret 2011, Penandatanganan Kerja sama antara PB PGRI dengan Korean Federation of Teachers Association. Kerja sama di antaranya tentang Joint Research, Workshop, dll.

  • Mohon peralihan dana BOS ke  Pemda di tinjau kembali karena sangat mempersulit sekolah. Dalam pembelian harus dilampirkan NPWP. SIUP dan SPK dari tempat pengambilan dana BOS di kantor Pos harus ada Rekomendasi dari Dinas.

  • RAKORNAS 2011, Jakarta Grand Cempaka Hotel

    Membahas berbagai persoalan guru, pendidikan, dan organisasi serta Proker sesuai Keputusan Konkernas III Gorontalo, PB PGRI mengundang Saudara Ketua dan Sekretaris Pengurus PGRI Provinsi untuk menghadiri acara Rakornas PGRI Tahun 2011 di Grand Cempaka Hotel, Jakarta 29 - 31 Mei 2011.